Danticat interview

http://www.krcc.org/post/i-am-witness-conversation-edwidge-danticat?fbclid=IwAR0LQ0UmLs13AFDSuy5bcP7KjYWbIxMLiLCIBnf1InXVuIPzOJJUt3Qnhgo

IA Assessment Rubric

Internal assessment criteria

Overview

There are five assessment criteria for the performance and individual oral presentation.

Criterion A: Performance -- 15 marks

Criterion B: Presentation of evidence supporting the student’s involvement in

the process leading up to the performance -- 5 marks

Criterion C: Presentation and use of language -- 5 marks

Criterion D: Critical reflection -- 5 marks

Criterion E: Knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the

original text and rationale for its realization -- 10 marks

Total --40 marks

Performance and individual oral presentation

Criterion A: Performance

Level descriptor

0 

The work does not reach a standard described by the desciptors below.

1– 4 

Limited performance skills are deployed, sometimes effectively and appropriately.

This limited involvement is reflected in a performance that shows a lack of conviction and a

limited understanding of the text.

5–8 

Adequate performance skills are deployed, mostly effectively and appropriately.

This involvement is reflected in a performance that shows some conviction and an

adequate understanding of the text.

9 –12 

Good performance skills are deployed effectively and appropriately.

This commitment is reflected in a performance that shows conviction and some sensitivity,

imagination or originality in interpretation of the text.

13 –15

Excellent performance skills are deployed highly effectively and appropriately.

This commitment is reflected in a performance that shows a high degree of conviction and

a sensitive, imaginative or original response to the text.

Criterion B: Presentation of evidence supporting the student’s involvement

in the process leading up to the performance

Level descriptor

0

The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

1

The student has taken a limited part in the process leading up to performance.

2

The student has taken an adequate part in the process leading up to performance.

3

The student has shown engagement in the process leading up to performance.

4

The student has been fully engaged in the process leading up to performance.

5

The student has been fully and profoundly engaged in the process leading up to

performance.

Criterion C: Presentation and use of language

Level descriptor

0

The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

1

The student makes a presentation but it is poorly organized and the use of language is

often unclear.

2

The presentation and use of language are mostly adequate, although there may be some

lapses; there is some evidence of structure and organization.

3

The presentation and use of language are adequate; the structure and organization are

adequate.

4

The presentation and use of language are good; the structure and organization are clear

and coherent.

5

The presentation and use of language are excellent; the structure and organization are

persuasive, clear and coherent.

Criterion D: Critical reflection

Level descriptor

0

The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

1

There is limited critical reflection on the performance.

2

There is some critical reflection on the performance..

3

There is adequate critical reflection on the performance.

4

There is sustained critical reflection on the performance.

5

There is sustained and illuminating critical reflection on the performance.

Criterion E: Knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original text and rationale for its realization

Level descriptor

     0

The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

1–2

There is limited knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original text.

3–4

There is some knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original text but

a limited rationale for its realization.

5–6

There is an adequate knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original

text and an adequate rationale for its realization.

7– 8

There is a good knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original text

and a coherent rationale for its realization.

9 –10

There is an excellent knowledge and understanding of the literary features of the original text and a coherent and persuasive rationale for its realization.